Inspection companies need to structure their post inspection activities. They need to be able to define and use standard follow up actions. It’s about what to do with the inspected equipment. Examples: Send to repair, Repair at site, Need to be re-certified in Work shop, ans.
We should try to use global actions, but inspectors also need to define their own.
I suggest the action list is a section (column) in the Inspection report together with responsible. The inspector company and the owner need to be see action status - as a list or on equipment.
2 Likes
Thanks so much for sharing your idea! To move forward, we need more votes and input from other users. So for now, your idea is at the “In Discussion” stage.
If you know any colleagues who feel the same way, please encourage them to join the conversation and share their thoughts.
Good idea. Follow-up actions would be very useful. In addition to some standard fields of follow-up-actions, e.g. repair-at-site, replace, etc. It could also be useful to consider supporting customer-specific input, such as “Repair at Workshop X”
1 Like